Engagements are structured around governance maturity and risk exposure. Most begin with a baseline assessment and progress into embedded execution.
Structured review of AI deployment, governance documentation, control gaps, and regulatory exposure. Delivers a risk-ranked findings report with remediation priorities and a defensible baseline the board can reference immediately.
For organizations that need to understand their AI governance posture before a regulatory cycle, board review, or transaction timeline.
90 days. Fixed scope. Clear deliverable.
Principal-level governance leadership embedded on a retained basis. AI governance oversight, enterprise risk assessment, model risk documentation, audit committee reporting, and regulatory readiness.
The principal operates as your named CAE with functional reporting to the audit committee. The same person who builds the governance architecture presents it to the board and defends it under examination.
6 to 12+ months. Retainer-based. Scalable by tier.
Closes AI governance documentation gaps, stress-tests the oversight narrative, and prepares the control environment for institutional diligence. Governance gaps discovered during transaction diligence cost time, credibility, and deal economics. This engagement ensures readiness before the diligence team arrives.
60 to 120 days. Scope tied to transaction timeline.
Engagements are retainer-based, structured in monthly terms with hours allocated by tier.
Our solutions are tailored to your organization’s unique AI governance and audit needs. We focus on driving measurable outcomes, whether ensuring AI compliance, mitigating risk, or enhancing internal controls. Let’s craft a custom approach for your business. Reach out to discuss a tailored engagement and pricing.
